Misconception between palliative care and euthanasia among Thai general practitioners: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care lower medical expenses and enhances quality of life, but misconception with euthanasia delays timely care and makes inappropriate patient management. OBJECTIVE: To examine the magnitude of misconceptions between palliative care and euthanasia among Thai general practitioners, explore the association with knowledge, attitudes, and practical experience, and assess the association between misconception and confidence in practicing and referring patients to palliative care centers. METHODS: All 144 general practitioners who were going to start residency training at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital in 2021 participated in this observational cross-sectional study. A chi-square test was utilized to examine the relationship between misconception and knowledge, attitude, practical experience, confidence to practice, and confidence to refer patients. Multivariable logistic regression was carried out while controlling for age, sex, knowledge, attitude, and experience to examine the relationship between misconception and confidence to practice and refer patients for palliative care. Statistical significance was defined at p < 0.05. RESULTS: About 41% of general physicians had misconceptions regarding palliative care and euthanasia. High knowledge was associated with a lower level of misconception (p = 0.01). The absence of misconceptions was weakly associated with a higher level of confidence in practicing palliative care, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.51 (95% confidence interval 0.73 to 3.10, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: High misconception rates between palliative care and euthanasia among young Thai physicians might impact their confidence in delivering palliative care. Training initiatives for medical students and practitioners can mitigate misconceptions, fostering better palliative care utilization in Thailand.

Perceptions of Learners and Specialists Toward ECHO Palliative Care Project in Thailand.

INTRODUCTION: The Extension of Community Health Outcomes (ECHO) is a global movement that aims to decentralize the knowledge of specialists to primary care. A pilot, ECHO palliative care project in Thailand, was introduced to enhance the implementation of palliative care practice. OBJECTIVE: To assess learners' and palliative care specialists' perceptions toward the ECHO palliative care project to improve and expand the project in the future. SETTING: A total of 15 hospitals in 7 provinces in Northern Thailand, including provincial and district hospitals. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted among learners (primary care providers) and palliative care specialists who participated in the pilot program. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the potential impact of the project on clinical practice, the strengths and weaknesses of the ECHO program and platform in the Thai context, and suggestions for expansion. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative analysis. Pre- and post-confidence scores, using a 5-point Likert Scale, for palliative care practice among learners were analyzed using paired T-tests. RESULTS: Twenty participants were interviewed: 15 learners and 5 palliative care specialists. The confidence in practicing palliative care after participating in the ECHO palliative care project significantly increased for the learners, from 2.93 (95% CI, 2.49-3.38) to 3.93 (95% CI, 3.68-4.19) points (P = .003). Three themes emerged through the process evaluation of the pilot ECHO palliative care project: (1) applicable lessons that can translate to practice, (2) an effective learning program and assessable platform, and (3) suggestions for expansion. CONCLUSION: The ECHO palliative care project increased confidence in providing palliative care for primary care providers in Thailand. Through capacity building, participants reported applying the knowledge to improve local health services and develop a network for consultations and referrals. There is potential for expansion of the ECHO palliative care project in Thailand.

Stakeholders' perspectives of a good death: A qualitative study from Thailand.

Background: A 'good death' is one of palliative care's main goals. However, there are different perspectives on what a good death is. Perspectives from three groups of people involved in the dying process: patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers; are crucial because how they interact will affect the overall quality of end-of-life care. Objective: The aims were to 1) explore what is a good death and 2) how to achieve it from the perspectives of those involved in patient care. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted between February to August 2019. The recruitment triad of stakeholders consisted of one patient with their primary caregiver and their physician. Interviews were conducted by researchers who had no prior relationship with the participants and were not a part of the healthcare team. Each research aim was analyzed separately using thematic content analysis. Data saturation was reached when no new or emerging themes emerged. Fourteen people were interviewed; five patients, five caregivers, and four physicians. Results: Regarding perspectives of a good death, four themes emerged: 1: Peaceful natural progression and symptom-free, 2: Acceptance of death and dignity, 3: Readiness for death is facilitated by social support and the environment, and 4: Faith and religious values can bring peace. For the second research question regarding how to help the patient achieve a good death, three themes emerged: 1: provide supportive care, 2: good communication, and 3: prioritize the patients' wishes. Conclusion: In the Thai context, the meaning of a good death relates to symptom control, acceptance of death, social support, and faith. However, a clear understanding of each individual's meaning of good death is required due to individualized needs and perceptions. Physicians and stakeholders looking to support good death should focus on providing supportive care, good communication, and prioritizing the patient's will and wishes.

Palliative Performance Scale and survival in patients with cancer and non-cancer diagnoses needing a palliative care consultation: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) has been frequently used to estimate the survival time of palliative care patients. The objective was to determine the associations between the PPS and survival time among cancer and non-cancer patients in Thailand. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. All in-patient adults who received a palliative care consultation at Chiang Mai University Hospital between 1 July 2018 to 31 July 2019 were included in the study and were followed-up until 26 June 2020. The Palliative Performance Scale was assessed using the validated Thai-Palliative Performance Scale for Adults. Survival analysis was used to determine the association between the Palliative Performance Scale and survival time among cancer and non-cancer patients. RESULTS: Out of 407 patients, 220 were male (54.1%). There were 307 cancer patients (75.4%) and 100 non-cancer patients (24.6%). The PPS and survival time in cancer patients were significantly correlated. Cancer patients with PPS 10, 20, 30, 40-60, and 70-80% had a median survival time of 2, 6, 13, 39, and 95 days, respectively. Non-cancer patients with PPS 10, 20, and 30% had a median survival time of 8, 6, and 24 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While useful for estimating survival time for cancer patients, other factors should be taken into account in estimating the survival time for non-cancer patients.

Appropriate Total cholesterol cut-offs for detection of abnormal LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol among low cardiovascular risk population.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines suggest screening for dyslipidemia in early adulthood. In Thailand, a screening total cholesterol level is most commonly used potentially due to the costs of the test. However, the appropriate TC cut-off point that correlates with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) levels for the low cardiovascular risk younger population have not been examined extensively in the literature. METHODS: This study identified 1754 subjects with low cardiovascular risk. All participants had a physical examination and a venous blood sample sent for laboratory assessment of fasting blood glucose, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C levels. A non-HDL-C level for everyone was calculated by subtracting HDL-C levels from their total cholesterol levels. Sensitivity and specificity of different TC cutoff points in detection of abnormal LDL-C levels (≥ 130 mg/dL and ≥ 160 mg/dL) and abnormal non-HDL-C levels (≥ 160 mg/dL and ≥ 190 mg/dL) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive utility of TC for the abnormal LDL-C and abnormal non-HDL-C levels. RESULTS: The conventional range TC cut off point, between 200 to 240, had varying diagnostic properties for detection of elevated LDL-C and Non-HDL-C within this low risk population. A TC cut off point 210 would have a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 92.5% for detection of LDL-C ≥ 130 and a sensitivity of 96.7% and specificity of 85.6% for identifying those with Non-HDL-C ≥ 160. The TC cut off point of 230 had a sensitivity of 74.9% and specificity of 92.0% in identifying those with LDL-C ≥ 160 and a sensitivity of 98.6% and specificity of 89.8% in detection of non-HDL-C ≥ 190. CONCLUSIONS: Early screening for dyslipidemia in young adults is suggested by many guidelines. This population is likely to be those with lower cardiovascular risk and may needed to have repeated screening over time. Screening using TC with appropriate a cut off points may be a more cost-effective screening test in settings with limited resources, coverage and accessibility.